Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] kvm tools: Add rwlock wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 05/30/2011 02:49 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >* Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >
> >>  On 05/30/2011 02:26 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >>  >>   >
> >>  >>   qemu also allows having more VCPUs than cores.
> >>  >
> >>  >I have to check again, then :) Thank you!
> >>  >I will try both with many VCPUs.
> >>
> >>  Note, with cpu overcommit the results are going to be bad.
> >
> >And that is good: if pushed hard enough it will trigger exciting (or
> >obscure) bugs in the guest kernel much faster than if there's no
> >overcommit, so it's rather useful for testing. (We made that
> >surprising experience with -rt.)
> >
> >Also, such simulation would be very obviously useful if you get
> >bugreports about 1024 or 4096 CPUs, like i do sometimes! :-) [*]
> 
> I'll be surprised if 1024 cpus actually boot on a reasonable 
> machine.  Without PLE support, any busy wait (like 
> smp_call_function_single()) turns into a delay the length scheduler 
> time slice (or CFS's unfairness measure, I forget how it's called) 
> - 3 or 4 orders of magnitude larger.  Even with PLE, it's 
> significantly slower, plus 1-2 orders of magnitude loss from the 
> overcommit itself.

You are probably right about 1024 CPUs.

Right now i can produce something similar to it: 42 vcpus on a single 
CPU:

	$ taskse 1 kvm run --cpus 42

And that hangs early on during bootup, around:

[    0.236000] Disabled fast string operations
[    0.242000]  #4
[    0.270000] Disabled fast string operations
[    0.275000]  #5
[    0.317000] Disabled fast string operations
[    0.322000]  #6
[    0.352000] Disabled fast string operations
[    0.358000]  #7
[    0.414000] Disabled fast string operations

The threads seem to be livelocked:

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND                                    
22227 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 12.9  0.8   0:06.39 kvm                                        
22230 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 12.9  0.8   0:06.36 kvm                                        
22226 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 11.9  0.8   0:07.04 kvm                                        
22228 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 11.9  0.8   0:06.38 kvm                                        
22229 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 11.9  0.8   0:06.37 kvm                                        
22231 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 11.9  0.8   0:06.37 kvm                                        
22232 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 11.9  0.8   0:06.36 kvm                                        
22233 mingo     20   0  471g  95m  904 R 11.9  0.8   0:06.33 kvm                                        
    7 root      -2  19     0    0    0 S  2.0  0.0   1:12.53 rcuc0             

with no apparent progress being made.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux