On 05/29/2011 08:16 AM, Li, Xin wrote:
> > > + else > > + best->ebx&= ~(bit(X86_FEATURE_SMEP)); > > Not needed - x86.c already masks unsupported features. Should KVM still support guest SMEP when host disables it thru nosmep?
No. We treat nosmep as "no smep for the kernel and any guests". NX is treated in the same way.
-- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
