Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kvm tools: Add ioeventfd support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Benchmarks ran on a seperate (non boot) 1GB virtio-blk device, 
> formatted as ext4, using bonnie++.
> 
> cmd line:
> # bonnie++ -d temp/ -c 2 -s 768 -u 0
> 
> Before:
> Version  1.96       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> Concurrency   2     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
> tux            768M   498  99 381127  74 269712  48  2871  99 717109  50 +++++ +++
> Latency             18368us   31063us   21281us    3017us    6875us     251ms
> Version  1.96       ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> tux                 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
>               files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
>                  16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
> Latency               148us     588us    2792us    1547us    1543us     218us
> 
> After:
> Version  1.96       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> Concurrency   2     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
> tux            768M   499  99 459779  73 350689  54  2997  99 860395  58 +++++ +++
> Latency             17194us   14619us   26358us    4055us    7890us   44122us
> Version  1.96       ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> tux                 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
>               files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
>                  16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
> Latency               135us     567us    2564us     134us    1500us     231us

In such cases it would *really* be useful, in addition of dumping 
80-100 raw numbers to summarize results and compare them for the 
reader, as i suspect you've done already? Please don't keep it a 
secret and don't force the reader to compare two tables with 80+ raw 
numbers! :-)

Something like:

" In short, block writes are 20% faster, block reads are 19.9% 
  faster, seeks got 16% faster. None of the operations got slower. "

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux