Re: [PERF RESULTS] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Krishna Kumar2/India/IBM wrote on 05/26/2011 09:51:32 PM:

> > Could you please try TCP_RRs as well?
>
> Right. Here's the result for TCP_RR:

The actual transaction rate/second numbers are:

_____________________________________________________________
#     RR1      RR2 (%)          SD1        SD2 (%)
_____________________________________________________________
1     9476     9903 (4.5)       28.9       19.8 (-31.4)
2     17337    18225 (5.1)      92.7       83.7 (-9.7)
4     17385    27902 (60.4)     364.8      315.8 (-13.4)
8     25560    42912 (67.8)     1428.1     1234.0 (-13.5)
16    35898    55934 (55.8)     4391.6     4038.1 (-8.0)
32    48048    80228 (66.9)     17391.4    14932.0 (-14.1)
64    60412    88929 (47.2)     71087.7    54230.1 (-23.7)
96    71263    92439 (29.7)     145434.1   128214.0 (-11.8)
128   84208    91014 (8.0)      233668.2   238888.6 (2.2)
_____________________________________________________________
RR: 37.3%     SD: -6.7%
_____________________________________________________________

Thanks,

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux