On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:57:13PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 05/05/2011 02:34:39 PM: > > > > Do I need to apply all the patches and simply test? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > - KK > > > > Exactly. You can also try to tune the threshold > > for interrupts as well. > > I haven't tuned the threshhold, it is left it at 3/4. I ran > the new qemu/vhost/guest, and the results for 1K, 2K and 16K > are below. Note this is a different kernel version from my > earlier test results. So, f.e., BW1 represents 2.6.39-rc2, > the original kernel; while BW2 represents 2.6.37-rc5 (MST's > kernel). This also isn't with the fixes you have sent just > now. I will get a run with that either late tonight or > tomorrow. One thing I'd suggest is merging v2.6.39-rc6 into that tree. rc2 is still pretty early, reason I use it is because that is what net-next is. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
