Re: nmi is broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/03/2011 01:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>  Yes.  Unfortunately that is very vendor and model specific.  The
>  architectural PMU is supported, but that is only available on Intel.

Is it supposed to have any practical value already? I did not yet find a
magic -cpu switch to let Linux detect anything, not to speak of perf or
watchdog support.

On the guest side it is supported for the watchdog (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c, look for X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON). It's also mentioned in perf_event_intel.c, but I don't know if it will work without the other PMU features being present.

>
>  Perhaps we could emulate the architectural PMU on AMD as well, and make
>  the detection code in the guest vendor agnostic.  Since it's based on a
>  cpuid bit, it should be safe.
>

We may only make Linux happy this way, no?

I would argue that if a feature is discoverable by a cpuid bit it shouldn't need to be qualified by vendor. No idea how other OSes work this out (or even if they make use of the architectural PMU).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux