Re: Bug in KVM clock backwards compensation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:06:01AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> And /me still wonders (like I did when this first popped up) if the
> proper place of determining TSC stability really have to be KVM.
> 
> If the Linux core fails to detect some instability and KVM has to jump
> in, shouldn't we better improve the core's detection abilities and make
> use of them in KVM? Conceptually this looks like we are currently just
> working around a core deficit in KVM.

Yes, good question. Has this ever triggered on a real machine (not
counting the suspend/resume issue in)?

Regards,

	Joerg

-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux