OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Maybe it's a regression of latest NMI injection patches. >> >> This worked before? Can you check if commits >> c2dd554dc61173ecb6b3741b680d2ae4c245d2ba and >> f86368493ec038218e8663cc1b6e5393cd8e008a have any impact on your problem? > > Unfortunately, no. I've checked kvm_inject_nmi() was not called if irq > was disabled on guest. To make sure situation, NMI is working if irq is enabled. > The path is following (without my patch, kvm_apic_nmi_wd_deliver is not > called), > > pit_do_work() > kvm_apic_nmi_wd_deliver() > kvm_apic_local_deliver() > __apic_accept_irq() > kvm_inject_nmi() > > so it is not meaningful to change after kvm_inject_nmi() (if I'm > understanding commits correctly). > > Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
