Re: [transparent networking] Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Implement virtio network device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/13/2011 09:33 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 04:02 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Asias He<asias.hejun@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>
>> >  >>  Here are some scp performance test for differenct implementations:
>> >  >>  None of rx and tx as thread:
>> >  >>  guest to host 3.2MB/s
>> >  >>  host  to guest 3.1MB/s
>> >  >>
>> >  >>  Only rx as thread:
>> >  >>  guest to host  14.7MB/s
>> >  >>  host  to guest 33.4MB/s
>> >  >>
>> >  >>  Both rx and tx as thread(This patch works this way):
>> >  >>  guest to host  19.8MB/s
>> >  >>  host  to guest 32.5MB/s
>> >  >>
>> >  >>  Signed-off-by: Asias He<asias.hejun@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >  >
>> >  >  This is already in master. Thanks!
>> >  >
>> >
>> >  Ingo suggested to CC the updated version of this patch to kvm list.
>> So I
>> >  am posting this patch again.
>>
>> Thanks Asias, cool stuff.
>>
>> Maybe other KVM developers want to chime in about how to best implement
>> transparent (non-TAP-using) guest-side networking.
>>
>> The best approach would be to not go down as low as the IP/Ethernet
>> packeting
>> level (it's unnecessary protocol overhead), but to implement some sort of
>> streaming, virtio based TCP connection proxying support.
>>
>> Strictly talking the guest does not need ICMP packets to have working
>> Internet
>> connectivity - only passing/tunneling through TCP sockets would be
>> enough. The
>> following highlevel ops are needed:
>>
>>   - connect/shutdown/close
>>   - send/receive
>>   - poll
>>
>> And would be passed through to the host side and mirrored there into real
>> connect/shutdown TCP socket ops and into send/receive ops.
>>
>> The guest OS does not need to be 'aware' of this in any way, as long
>> as the
>> bzImage has this magic guest tunneling support included.
>>
>> Obviously, such a highlevel approach would be much faster as well than
>> any
>> packet level virtual networking approach.
>>
>> Does something like this exist upstream, or do we have to implement it?
>>
> 
> macvtap does non-privileged setupless networking.

Great! Thanks Avi!

-- 
Best Regards,
Asias He
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux