On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Sasha Levin wrote:
Attempt to use mmap first for working with a disk image, if the attempt is failed (for example, large image on a 32bit system) fallback to using read/write. Performance (kB/s) test using bonnie++ showed the following improvement: Sequential write: 14% Sequential rewrite: 15% Sequential read: 7% Random seek latency: 82%
Can you also please share the before and after raw data?
-struct disk_image *disk_image__new(int fd, uint64_t size, struct disk_image_operations *ops) +static int raw_image__read_sector_mmap(struct disk_image *self, uint64_t sector, void *dst, uint32_t dst_len) { - struct disk_image *self; + uint64_t offset = sector << SECTOR_SHIFT; - self = malloc(sizeof *self); - if (!self) - return NULL; + if (offset + dst_len > self->size) + return -1; - self->fd = fd; - self->size = size; - self->ops = ops; + memmove(dst, self->mapping + offset, dst_len);
Why do you want to use memmove() here? The areas cannot overlap. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html