On 2011-04-08 18:08, Glauber Costa wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> + } >> >> Did I miss some change in the plan? I thought we were heading for a >> generic, reusable driftfix tool box (or periodic timer service)? Or is >> this intentionally an intermediate step? > > Which is a medium to long way in the future. There is benefit of having > this early, since it can deliver real functionality - a reliable hpet, > and converting to whatever the api may look like in the future. > Well, if the PIT and the RTC should use it as well, which is probably rather a short term goal, we already have two more users. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
