On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 08:35:28AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 05:10 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > This patch adds a check_perm callback for each opcode into
> > the instruction emulator. This will be used to do all
> > necessary permission checks on instructions before checking
> > whether they are intercepted or not.
> >
> >
> > @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ struct decode_cache {
> > u8 seg_override;
> > unsigned int d;
> > int (*execute)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
> > + int (*check_perm)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
>
> I originally mean to use a group-like structure to have check_perm only
> when needed, but I guess this is a premature optimization. #define D(_y)
> { .flags = (_y) }
> > #define DI(_y, _i) { .flags = (_y), .intercept = x86_intercept_##_i }
> > +#define DIP(_y, _i) { .flags = (_y), .intercept = x86_intercept_##_i, \
> > + .check_perm = em_check_perm_##_i }
>
> Sorry, this (and all the #defines which follow) are just obfuscating. I
> set a bad example here, but the following patches show there is nothing
> gained by the ## games. Please use the full function name.
Yeah, this became a bit obfuscating in the end. My intention was to keep
the opcode tables clean and readable, but I changed it now and added the
check-functions directly removing all the #defines.
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
