On 04/03/2011 12:53 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 04/03/2011 09:21 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Anthony Liguori<anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 03/31/2011 12:30 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Weâre proud to announce the native Linux KVM tool!
>>>>
>>>> Neat!
>>>>
>>>> As something of a lesson of history, I'd suggest picking a more unique
>>>> name
>>>> while it's still a prototype :-)
>>>
>>> I disagree, i find it pretty handy and intuitive to run 'kvm ./disk.img'
>>> to
>>> boot KVM and this particular tool name has not been taken yet either.
>>
>> Some distributions install qemu-kvm as /usr/bin/kvm.
>>
>>> perf uses a similar concept: the kernel subsystem is generally called
>>> 'perf',
>>> and the (Linux specific) user-space tool is called 'perf' as well. It
>>> makes
>>> quite a bit of sense.
>>
>> Well, this is bound to cause confusion as the tool is yet quite immature.
>
> Yes, that's really unfortunate. I don't care too much what we call the
> tool but I definitely agree with Ingo that 'kvm' is more discoverable
> to users. Any suggestions?
>
> Pekka
Well, I personally do not care much either. If there a fear we might interfere
with some distribution probably we could re-name it "nkvm" (ie from Native KVM).
I've googled it and found there is no such name used yet. Hm?
--
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
