Re: [PATCH]arch:x86:kvm:i8254.h Fix typo in kvm_pit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Avi Kivity wrote:

> > > > The below patch changes base_addresss to base_address.
> > > > Note: I have grepped for base_addresss and nothing shows up,
> > > > grepping for base_address gets me lots of output, telling me that
> > > > this is a typo, but could be wrong.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h | 2 +-
> > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h
> > > > index 46d08ca..c2fa48b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h
> > > > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct kvm_kpit_state {
> > > > };
> > > > 
> > > > struct kvm_pit {
> > > > - unsigned long base_addresss;
> > > > + unsigned long base_address;
> > > > struct kvm_io_device dev;
> > > > struct kvm_io_device speaker_dev;
> > > > struct kvm *kvm;
> > > 
> > > Why not remove the variable completely?
> > > 
> > 
> > didnt even think to completely remove the variable(figured it was used
> > somewhere).I will look at that and resend with removal of the variable for
> > you..
> 
> Well if it was used, you ought to have changed all of the users, no?

I am afraid Justin is not trying to compile-test his patches (I got this 
suspicion after last patchset trying to remove all the includes of 
version.h).

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux