Re: KVM: x86: better fix for race between nmi injection and enabling nmi window

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/30/2011 06:30 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Based on Gleb's idea, fix race between nmi injection and enabling
nmi window in a simpler way.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a6a129f..9a7cc1be 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5152,6 +5152,7 @@ static void kvm_put_guest_xcr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
  	int r;
+	int nmi_pending;
  	bool req_int_win = !irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)&&
  		vcpu->run->request_interrupt_window;

@@ -5195,11 +5196,13 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  	if (unlikely(r))
  		goto out;

+	nmi_pending = ACCESS_ONCE(vcpu->arch.nmi_pending);
+
  	if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu) || req_int_win) {
  		inject_pending_event(vcpu);

  		/* enable NMI/IRQ window open exits if needed */
-		if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending)
+		if (nmi_pending)
  			kvm_x86_ops->enable_nmi_window(vcpu);
  		else if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) || req_int_win)
  			kvm_x86_ops->enable_irq_window(vcpu);


What about the check in inject_pending_events()?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux