On 2011-03-17 23:42, Glauber Costa wrote:
> kvmclock presence can be signalled by two different flags. So for
> device creation, we have to test for both.
Patch is OK, but the subject's logic is inverted.
Jan
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> hw/kvmclock.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/kvmclock.c b/hw/kvmclock.c
> index b6ceddf..004c4ad 100644
> --- a/hw/kvmclock.c
> +++ b/hw/kvmclock.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,11 @@ static SysBusDeviceInfo kvmclock_info = {
> void kvmclock_create(void)
> {
> if (kvm_enabled() &&
> - first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)) {
> + first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)
> +#ifdef KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2
> + || (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2)
> +#endif
> + )) {
> sysbus_create_simple("kvmclock", -1, NULL);
> }
> }
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
