On 2011-03-11 22:34, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:12:50PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> @@ -956,7 +956,6 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
>>>> abort();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - ret = 0; /* exit loop */
>>>> switch (run->exit_reason) {
>>>
>>> Better keep ret assignment here so default behaviour is to
>>> exit loop? EXCP_INTERRUPT.
>>
>> There is no real default behavior: in two cases we stay in the loop, in
>> two others we leave, and the rest obtains ret from a return value.
>> Moreover, if a new case misses to set ret, the compiler will complain.
>>
>> Jan
>
> It will not complain because "ret" is used to store return value
> of KVM_RUN.
>
Right, I'll disentangle this duplicate use of 'ret' (writing patches is
likely much better than watching more news this morning...).
Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
