On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 08:20:42AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/07/2011 03:16 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > > According to the comments in stackprotector.h its the same on amd64 (the > > difference is that gcc expects the canary value at a different offset > > from %gs). > > So we should probably unlazy %gs reload alltogether. > > On x86_64 we don't do lazy %gs reload (lazy %fs instead), so it should > work as is. Right. I mixed that up with the lazy KERNEL_GS_BASE switching on amd64. -- AMD Operating System Research Center Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
