On 03/06/2011 08:16 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/06/2011 02:14 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 03/04/2011 01:00 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >>> No need to record the gfn to verifier the pte has the same mode as >>> current vcpu, it's because we only speculatively update the pte only >>> if the pte and vcpu have the same mode >> >> True. We can, as an additional cleanup, change mmu_pte_write_new_pte() to just do vcpu->arch.mmu.update_pte(...) instead of the if (). >> > > Also, we can remove the pfn guessing and to it in FNAME(update_pte), using gfn_to_pfn_atomic(). > OK, i'll do these in the next version, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
