On 03/02/2011 09:42 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:36:34PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:03:42PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2011-03-02 19:43, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > >> On 02/28/2011 04:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > >>> On 02/28/2011 01:13 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> If there's a git tree of this I'll be happy to do an autotest run. > > >>> > > >>> Sure, it's branch iothread-win32 of git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git > > >> > > >> Fails on Fedora 9 i386 install, hangs right after "Performing post > > >> install configuration...". The guest is processing interrupts but > > >> the mouse won't move, and it doesn't make progress. > > >> > > >> Configured with --enable-io-thread. Perhaps the problem exists even > > >> before the patchset. > > > > > > Probably unrelated, looks similar to the regression seen with qemu-kvm. > > > > > > > Do these patches change some behavior or not? > > Yes, they change some behaviour. Autotest fails. Sorry, i misunderstood. I don't think these patches change any behaviour. Avi's failure case is similar to what i've seen earlier upon qemu->qemu-kvm merge. Conclusion is there is no new regression introduced by these patches.
Well that's strange, since qemu-kvm now passes autotest (and this was qemu.git + patchset, not qemu-kvm).
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
