On Thursday 24 February 2011 18:11:44 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:08:22PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 February 2011 16:45:37 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:59:04PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 23 February 2011 08:19:21 Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 13:11 +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > > Then we can support mask bit operation of assigned devices now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks pretty good overall. A few comments below. It seems like we
> > > > > should be able to hook this into vfio with a small stub in kvm. We
> > > > > just need to be able to communicate disabling and enabling of
> > > > > individual msix vectors. For brute force, we could do this with a
> > > > > lot of eventfds, triggered by kvm and consumed by vfio, two per
> > > > > MSI-X vector. Not sure if there's something smaller that could do
> > > > > it. Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Alex, thanks for your comments. See my comments below:
> > > > > Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >
> > > > > > arch/x86/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> > > > > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 +-
> > > > > > include/linux/kvm.h | 21 ++++
> > > > > > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 25 ++++
> > > > > > virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 44 +++++++
> > > > > > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 38 ++++++-
> > > > > > virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c | 286
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > virt/kvm/msix_mmio.h
> > > > > >
> > > > > > | 25 ++++
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 8 files changed, 442 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > create mode 100644 virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c
> > > > > > create mode 100644 virt/kvm/msix_mmio.h
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile b/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
> > > > > > index f15501f..3a0d851 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
> > > > > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ CFLAGS_vmx.o := -I.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kvm-y += $(addprefix ../../../virt/kvm/, kvm_main.o
ioapic.o
> >
> > \
> >
> > > > > > coalesced_mmio.o irq_comm.o eventfd.o \
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - assigned-dev.o)
> > > > > > + assigned-dev.o msix_mmio.o)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kvm-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_API) += $(addprefix ../../../virt/kvm/,
> > > > > > iommu.o) kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF) += $(addprefix
> > > > > > ../../../virt/kvm/, async_pf.o)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > > > index fa708c9..89bf12c 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > > > @@ -1966,6 +1966,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > case KVM_CAP_X86_ROBUST_SINGLESTEP:
> > > > > > case KVM_CAP_XSAVE:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > case KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF:
> > > > > > + case KVM_CAP_MSIX_MMIO:
> > > > > > r = 1;
> > > > > > break;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > case KVM_CAP_COALESCED_MMIO:
> > > > > > @@ -3807,6 +3808,7 @@ static int
> > > > > > emulator_write_emulated_onepage(unsigned long addr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gpa_t gpa;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + int r;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write(vcpu, addr, exception);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -3822,14 +3824,16 @@ static int
> > > > > > emulator_write_emulated_onepage(unsigned long addr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mmio:
> > > > > > trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_WRITE, bytes, gpa, *(u64 *)val);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + r = vcpu_mmio_write(vcpu, gpa, bytes, val);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Is this MMIO handled locally?
> > > > > > */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (!vcpu_mmio_write(vcpu, gpa, bytes, val))
> > > > > > + if (!r)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > vcpu->mmio_needed = 1;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
> > > > > > + vcpu->run->exit_reason = (r == -ENOTSYNC) ?
> > > > > > + KVM_EXIT_MSIX_ROUTING_UPDATE : KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
> > >
> > > This use of -ENOTSYNC is IMO confusing.
> > > How about we make vcpu_mmio_write return the positive exit reason?
> > > Negative value will mean an error.
> >
> > Make sense. I would update it.
> >
> > > > > > vcpu->run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->mmio_phys_addr = gpa;
> > > > > > vcpu->run->mmio.len = vcpu->mmio_size = bytes;
> > > > > > vcpu->run->mmio.is_write = vcpu->mmio_is_write = 1;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h
> > > > > > index ea2dc1a..ad9df4b 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/kvm.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/kvm.h
> > > > > > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct kvm_pit_config {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define KVM_EXIT_NMI 16
> > > > > > #define KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR 17
> > > > > > #define KVM_EXIT_OSI 18
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#define KVM_EXIT_MSIX_ROUTING_UPDATE 19
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* For KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR */
> > > > > > #define KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION 1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -541,6 +542,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_pvinfo {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_PVINFO 57
> > > > > > #define KVM_CAP_PPC_IRQ_LEVEL 58
> > > > > > #define KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF 59
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#define KVM_CAP_MSIX_MMIO 60
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -672,6 +674,9 @@ struct kvm_clock_data {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG _IOW(KVMIO, 0x7a, struct
> > > > > > kvm_xen_hvm_config) #define KVM_SET_CLOCK
> > > > > > _IOW(KVMIO, 0x7b, struct kvm_clock_data) #define KVM_GET_CLOCK
> > > > > > _IOR(KVMIO, 0x7c, struct kvm_clock_data)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/* Available with KVM_CAP_MSIX_MMIO */
> > > > > > +#define KVM_REGISTER_MSIX_MMIO _IOW(KVMIO, 0x7d, struct
> > > > > > kvm_msix_mmio_user) +#define KVM_UNREGISTER_MSIX_MMIO
> > > > > > _IOW(KVMIO, 0x7e, struct kvm_msix_mmio_user)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* Available with KVM_CAP_PIT_STATE2 */
> > > > > > #define KVM_GET_PIT2 _IOR(KVMIO, 0x9f, struct
> > > > > > kvm_pit_state2) #define KVM_SET_PIT2 _IOW(KVMIO,
> > > > > > 0xa0, struct kvm_pit_state2)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -795,4 +800,20 @@ struct kvm_assigned_msix_entry {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __u16 padding[3];
> > > > > >
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#define KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV (1 << 0)
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE (1 << 8)
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK 0x00ff
> > > > > > +#define KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_MASK 0xff00
> > > > > > +struct kvm_msix_mmio_user {
> > > > > > + __u32 dev_id;
> > > > > > + __u16 type;
> > > > > > + __u16 max_entries_nr;
> > > > > > + __u64 base_addr;
> > > > > > + __u64 base_va;
> > > > > > + __u64 flags;
> > > > > > + __u64 reserved[4];
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_H */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > > > > > index 7d313e0..c10670c 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > > > > > @@ -233,6 +233,27 @@ struct kvm_memslots {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > KVM_PRIVATE_MEM_SLOTS];
> > > > > >
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#define KVM_MSIX_MMIO_MAX 32
> > > > >
> > > > > I assume this is based on 32 devices/bus, but we could exceed this
> > > > > is we add more buses or make use of more functions. How hard is
> > > > > it to make this dynamic?
> > > >
> > > > We can improve this later(maybe with balance tree?). 32 should be
> > > > more than sufficient for now. And this patchset has been in the
> > > > mailing list for months, I really want to get it in first...
> > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +struct kvm_msix_mmio {
> > > > > > + u32 dev_id;
> > > > > > + u16 type;
> > > > > > + u16 max_entries_nr;
> > > > > > + u64 flags;
> > > > > > + gpa_t table_base_addr;
> > > > > > + hva_t table_base_va;
> > > > > > + gpa_t pba_base_addr;
> > > > > > + hva_t pba_base_va;
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +struct kvm_msix_m4mio_dev {
> > > > > > + struct kvm *kvm;
> > > > > > + struct kvm_io_device table_dev;
> > > > > > + int mmio_nr;
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio mmio[KVM_MSIX_MMIO_MAX];
> > > > > > + struct mutex lock;
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct kvm {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > spinlock_t mmu_lock;
> > > > > > raw_spinlock_t requests_lock;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -281,6 +302,7 @@ struct kvm {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > long mmu_notifier_count;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #endif
> > > > > >
> > > > > > long tlbs_dirty;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev msix_mmio_dev;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* The guest did something we don't support. */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -553,6 +575,9 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier(struct
> > > > > > kvm *kvm,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > int kvm_request_irq_source_id(struct kvm *kvm);
> > > > > > void kvm_free_irq_source_id(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +int kvm_assigned_device_update_msix_mask_bit(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > + int assigned_dev_id, int entry, bool mask);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* For vcpu->arch.iommu_flags */
> > > > > > #define KVM_IOMMU_CACHE_COHERENCY 0x1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> > > > > > index ae72ae6..d1598a6 100644
> > > > > > --- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> > > > > > +++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> > > > > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > > > > #include "irq.h"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#include "msix_mmio.h"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel
> > > > > > *kvm_find_assigned_dev(struct list_head *head,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > int assigned_dev_id)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -191,12 +192,25 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_irq(struct
> > > > > > kvm *kvm,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kvm_deassign_irq(kvm, assigned_dev,
> > > > > > assigned_dev->irq_requested_type);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +static void assigned_device_free_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > + struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *adev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio mmio;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mmio.dev_id = adev->assigned_dev_id;
> > > > > > + mmio.type = KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV |
> > > > > > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE;
> > > > > > + kvm_free_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static void kvm_free_assigned_device(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel
> > > > > > *assigned_dev)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kvm_free_assigned_irq(kvm, assigned_dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + assigned_device_free_msix_mmio(kvm, assigned_dev);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __pci_reset_function(assigned_dev->dev);
> > > > > > pci_restore_state(assigned_dev->dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -785,3 +799,33 @@ out:
> > > > > > return r;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/* The caller should hold kvm->lock */
> > > > > > +int kvm_assigned_device_update_msix_mask_bit(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > + int assigned_dev_id, int entry, bool mask)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + int r = -EFAULT;
> > > > > > + struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *adev;
> > > > > > + int i;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
> > > > > > + return r;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + adev = kvm_find_assigned_dev(&kvm->arch.assigned_dev_head,
> > > > > > + assigned_dev_id);
> > > > > > + if (!adev)
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* For non-MSIX enabled devices, entries_nr == 0 */
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < adev->entries_nr; i++)
> > > > > > + if (adev->host_msix_entries[i].entry == entry) {
> > > > > > + if (mask)
> > > > > > + disable_irq_nosync(
> > > > > > + adev->host_msix_entries[i].vector);
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + enable_irq(adev->host_msix_entries[i].vector);
> > > > > > + r = 0;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +out:
> > > > > > + return r;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > > > > index b1b6cbb..b7807c8 100644
> > > > > > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > > > > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > > > > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #include "coalesced_mmio.h"
> > > > > > #include "async_pf.h"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#include "msix_mmio.h"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > > > > > #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -509,6 +510,7 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct mm_struct *mm = kvm->mm;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kvm_arch_sync_events(kvm);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + kvm_unregister_msix_mmio_dev(kvm);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
> > > > > > list_del(&kvm->vm_list);
> > > > > > spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -1877,6 +1879,24 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file
> > > > > > *filp,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> > > > > > break;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #endif
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + case KVM_REGISTER_MSIX_MMIO: {
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user mmio_user;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + r = -EFAULT;
> > > > > > + if (copy_from_user(&mmio_user, argp, sizeof mmio_user))
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_register_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio_user);
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + case KVM_UNREGISTER_MSIX_MMIO: {
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user mmio_user;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + r = -EFAULT;
> > > > > > + if (copy_from_user(&mmio_user, argp, sizeof mmio_user))
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio_user);
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > default:
> > > > > > r = kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
> > > > > > if (r == -ENOTTY)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -1988,6 +2008,12 @@ static int kvm_dev_ioctl_create_vm(void)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return r;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #endif
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + r = kvm_register_msix_mmio_dev(kvm);
> > > > > > + if (r < 0) {
> > > > > > + kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> > > > > > + return r;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > r = anon_inode_getfd("kvm-vm", &kvm_vm_fops, kvm, O_RDWR);
> > > > > > if (r < 0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -2223,14 +2249,18 @@ static void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct
> > > > > > kvm_io_bus *bus)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > int kvm_io_bus_write(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_bus bus_idx,
> > > > > > gpa_t addr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > int len, const void *val)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - int i;
> > > > > > + int i, r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct kvm_io_bus *bus;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > bus = srcu_dereference(kvm->buses[bus_idx], &kvm->srcu);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - for (i = 0; i < bus->dev_count; i++)
> > > > > > - if (!kvm_iodevice_write(bus->devs[i], addr, len, val))
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < bus->dev_count; i++) {
> > > > > > + r = kvm_iodevice_write(bus->devs[i], addr, len, val);
> > > > > > + if (r == -ENOTSYNC)
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + else if (!r)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return 0;
> > >
> > > So the above will be
> > >
> > > if (r >= 0)
> > >
> > > return r;
> > >
> > > > > > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + return r;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* kvm_io_bus_read - called under kvm->slots_lock */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 0000000..dde9b62
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * MSI-X MMIO emulation
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Intel Corporation
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version
> > > > > > 2. See + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Author:
> > > > > > + * Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include "msix_mmio.h"
> > > > > > +#include "iodev.h"
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int update_msix_mask_bit(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> > > > > > kvm_msix_mmio *mmio, + int entry, u32 flag)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + if (mmio->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV)
> > > > > > + return kvm_assigned_device_update_msix_mask_bit(kvm,
> > > > > > + mmio->dev_id, entry, flag);
> > > > > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/* Caller must hold dev->lock */
> > > > > > +static int get_mmio_table_index(struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *dev,
> > > > > > + gpa_t addr, int len)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + gpa_t start, end;
> > > > > > + int i, r = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < dev->mmio_nr; i++) {
> > > > > > + start = dev->mmio[i].table_base_addr;
> > > > > > + end = dev->mmio[i].table_base_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE *
> > > > > > + dev->mmio[i].max_entries_nr;
> > > > > > + if (addr >= start && addr + len <= end) {
> > > > > > + r = i;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > Yet another potential user of the weight balanced tree ;)
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, we can improve it later.
> > > >
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return r;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int msix_table_mmio_read(struct kvm_io_device *this,
> > > > > > gpa_t addr, int len, + void *val)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev =
> > > > > > + container_of(this, struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev, table_dev);
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio *mmio;
> > > > > > + int idx, ret = 0, entry, offset, r;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + idx = get_mmio_table_index(mmio_dev, addr, len);
> > > > > > + if (idx < 0) {
> > > > > > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + if ((addr & 0x3) || (len != 4 && len != 8))
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + offset = addr & 0xf;
> > > > > > + if (offset == PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL && len == 8)
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > >
> > > This is not as strict as it could be. Also
> > > see below (in write) for an idea how to make the code clearer.
> > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[idx];
> > > > > > + entry = (addr - mmio->table_base_addr) / PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > > > > > + r = copy_from_user(val, (void __user *)(mmio->table_base_va +
> > > > > > + entry * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE + offset), len);
> > > > > > + if (r)
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > >
> > > Want to give the caller some indication of an error?
> > > If not add a comment why.
> >
> > I don't think we have a proper way to indicate the error now.
>
> Then let's add a comment, and skip the goto - it's just confusing:
>
> /* Ignore return value, we don't have a way to indicate the
> * error. */
> r = copy_from_user(val, (void __user *)(mmio->table_base_va +
> entry * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE + offset), len);
Um... I really think it's quite obvious in the code.
>
> > Also the
> > table_base_va already passed the checking when MMIO registered. We can
> > add more error info later.
> >
> > > > > > +out:
> > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int msix_table_mmio_write(struct kvm_io_device *this,
> > > > > > gpa_t addr, + int len, const void *val)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev =
> > > > > > + container_of(this, struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev, table_dev);
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio *mmio;
> > > > > > + int idx, entry, offset, ret = 0, r = 0;
> > > > > > + gpa_t entry_base;
> > > > > > + u32 old_ctrl, new_ctrl;
> > >
> > > These are really __le32. Pls make them so and then
> > > fix up the sparse errors.
> > >
> > > > > > + u32 *ctrl_pos;
> > >
> > > get_user should not be done on u32 *, it should be
> > > __user. Does not sparse complain about this?
> >
> > Haven't use sparse to check the patches. Would do it later.
>
> Please do. It's a lot of code with tricky pointer math, must make sure
> we are not accessing userspace pointers directly etc.
All following patches has been checked.
>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->kvm->lock);
> > > > > > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + idx = get_mmio_table_index(mmio_dev, addr, len);
> > > > > > + if (idx < 0) {
> > > > > > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + if ((addr & 0x3) || (len != 4 && len != 8))
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + offset = addr & 0xF;
> > > > >
> > > > > nit, this 0xf above.
> > > >
> > > > So you like another mask?
> > >
> > > Yes, this should be
> > >
> > > offset = addr % PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > >
> > > > > > + if (offset == PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL && len == 8)
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > >
> > > I think it's a good idea to be as strict as possible.
> > > Also let's quote the spec. Finally using % will make
> > > the logic more transparent. How about the below?
> > >
> > > /* For all accesses to MSI-X Table and MSI-X PBA fields, software must
> > > use
> > >
> > > aligned full DWORD or aligned full QWORD transactions; otherwise,
> > > the result is undefined. */
> > >
> > > if (len == 4) {
> > >
> > > if (addr % 4)
> > >
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > } else if (len == 8) {
> > >
> > > if (addr % 8)
> > >
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > } else
> > >
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > As read needs same logic it's likely a good idea
> > > to add a function for this.
> > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[idx];
> > > > > > + entry = (addr - mmio->table_base_addr) / PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > > > > > + entry_base = mmio->table_base_va + entry * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > > > > > + ctrl_pos = (u32 *)(entry_base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (get_user(old_ctrl, ctrl_pos))
> > >
> > > It's probably a good idea to do access_ok check for the whole
> > > entry here, and then use __get_user etc below, these are cheaper.
> >
> > table_base_va already passed access_ok checking. I am not sure if we need
> > to do it again.
>
> Yes but the process invoking the ioctl can be different from the one
> invoking the mmio.
I don't understand why it matters here...
Oh, I found I missed your original point. You mean we can check all entry and call
a cheaper __get_user instread of get_user. Well, we can leave this kind of tweak
later...
>
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* No allow writing to other fields when entry is unmasked */
> > >
> > > Do not allow.
> > >
> > > > > > + if (!(old_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) &&
> > > > > > + offset != PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL)
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(entry_base + offset), val,
> > > > > > len))
> > >
> > > any such cast is suspect.
> > > Is entry_base really gpa? If it was you can not cast it to __user.
> >
> > HVA.
>
> Then don't declare it gpa_t
Oh, typo... Would update it later.
>
> > > I think it should be void __user *.
> > >
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (get_user(new_ctrl, ctrl_pos))
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > >
> > > get_user assumes aligned address. But there's no guarantee ctrl_pos
> > > is aligned because table_base_va might be misaligned.
> >
> > table_base_va already passed access_ok() check.
>
> access_ok done on table_base_va only checks that the address
> is not a kernel one.
Now table_base_va's alignment has been checked(see the latest patchset), so I
think we're fine here.
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if ((offset < PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL && len == 4) ||
> > > > > > + (offset < PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA && len == 8))
> > > > > > + ret = -ENOTSYNC;
> > >
> > > Better to use != and not <, effectively same.
> > >
> > > Or in the above we can do:
> > > bool control;
> > > if (len == 4) {
> > >
> > > if (addr % 4)
> > >
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > control = offset == PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL;
> > >
> > > } else if (len == 8) {
> > >
> > > if (addr % 8)
> > >
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > control = offset == PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_DATA;
> > >
> > > } else
> > >
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > > > Couldn't we avoid the above get_user(new_ctrl,...) if we tested
> > > > > this first? I'd also prefer to see a direct goto out here since
> > > > > it's not entirely obvious that this first 'if' always falls into
> > > > > the below 'if'. I'm not a fan of using an error code as a special
> > > > > non-error return either.
> > > >
> > > > In fact when offset==PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA and len ==8, we need to
> > > > check new_ctrl to see if they indeed modified ctrl bits.
> > > >
> > > > I would try to make the logic here more clear.
> > > >
> > > > > > + if (old_ctrl == new_ctrl)
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!(old_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) &&
> > > > > > + (new_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT))
> > > > > > + r = update_msix_mask_bit(mmio_dev->kvm, mmio, entry, 1);
> > > > > > + else if ((old_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) &&
> > > > > > + !(new_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT))
> > > > > > + r = update_msix_mask_bit(mmio_dev->kvm, mmio, entry, 0);
> > > > >
> > > > > An xor would remove some redundancy here
> > > > >
> > > > > if ((old_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) ^ (new_ctrl &
> > > > > PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT)) r =
> > > > > update_msix_mask_bit(mmio_dev->kvm, mmio, entry, !!(new_ctrl &
> > > > > PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT));
> > > >
> > > > Oh, yes, sure...
> > >
> > > Also why not set ret to correct value directly?
> > >
> > > > > > + if (r || ret)
> > > > > > + ret = -ENOTSYNC;
> > >
> > > when is ret set? And why not to the correct value directly?
> > >
> > > > > > +out:
> > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->kvm->lock);
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static const struct kvm_io_device_ops msix_mmio_table_ops = {
> > > > > > + .read = msix_table_mmio_read,
> > > > > > + .write = msix_table_mmio_write,
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int kvm_register_msix_mmio_dev(struct kvm *kvm)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + kvm_iodevice_init(&kvm->msix_mmio_dev.table_dev,
> > > > > > &msix_mmio_table_ops); + mutex_init(&kvm->msix_mmio_dev.lock);
> > > > > > + kvm->msix_mmio_dev.kvm = kvm;
> > > > > > + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > > > > > + ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
> > > > > > + &kvm->msix_mmio_dev.table_dev);
> > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int kvm_unregister_msix_mmio_dev(struct kvm *kvm)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > > > > > + ret = kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
> > > > > > + &kvm->msix_mmio_dev.table_dev);
> > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int kvm_vm_ioctl_register_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user *mmio_user)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev = &kvm->msix_mmio_dev;
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio *mmio = NULL;
> > > > > > + int r = 0, i;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < mmio_dev->mmio_nr; i++) {
> > > > > > + if (mmio_dev->mmio[i].dev_id == mmio_user->dev_id &&
> > > > > > + (mmio_dev->mmio[i].type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK)
==
> > > > > > + (mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK)) {
> > > > > > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[i];
> > > > > > + if (mmio->max_entries_nr != mmio_user->max_entries_nr)
{
> > > > > > + r = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + if (mmio_user->max_entries_nr > KVM_MAX_MSIX_PER_DEV) {
> > > > > > + r = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + /* All reserved currently */
> > > > > > + if (mmio_user->flags) {
> > > > > > + r = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK) !=
> > > > > > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV) {
> > > > > > + r = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_MASK) !=
> > > > > > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE) {
> > > > > > + r = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, mmio_user->base_va,
> > > > > > + mmio_user->max_entries_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE)) {
> > > > > > + r = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + if (!mmio) {
> > > > > > + if (mmio_dev->mmio_nr == KVM_MSIX_MMIO_MAX) {
> > > > > > + r = -ENOSPC;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr];
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mmio_dev->mmio_nr++;
> > > > > > + mmio->max_entries_nr = mmio_user->max_entries_nr;
> > > > > > + mmio->dev_id = mmio_user->dev_id;
> > > > > > + mmio->flags = mmio_user->flags;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK) ==
> > > > > > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV)
> > > > > > + mmio->type = KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV;
> > > > > > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_MASK) ==
> > > > > > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE) {
> > > > > > + mmio->type |= KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE;
> > > > > > + mmio->table_base_addr = mmio_user->base_addr;
> > > > > > + mmio->table_base_va = mmio_user->base_va;
> > >
> > > Also check alignment for these values. base_va should be
> > > at least 4 byte aligned. Maybe more, need to think about it ...
> > > Look in spec for table_base_addr alignment.
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > --
> > regards
> > Yang, Sheng
> >
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +out:
> > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + return r;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int kvm_free_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msix_mmio
> > > > > > *mmio) +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev = &kvm->msix_mmio_dev;
> > > > > > + int r = 0, i, j;
> > > > >
> > > > > set r = -EINVAL here
> > > > >
> > > > > > + bool found = 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!mmio)
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + BUG_ON(mmio_dev->mmio_nr > KVM_MSIX_MMIO_MAX);
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < mmio_dev->mmio_nr; i++) {
> > > > > > + if (mmio_dev->mmio[i].dev_id == mmio->dev_id &&
> > > > > > + mmio_dev->mmio[i].type == mmio->type) {
> > > > > > + found = true;
> > > > >
> > > > > set r = 0 here
> > > > >
> > > > > > + for (j = i; j < mmio_dev->mmio_nr - 1; j++)
> > > > > > + mmio_dev->mmio[j] = mmio_dev->mmio[j + 1];
> > > > > > + mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr].max_entries_nr = 0;
> > > > > > + mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr].dev_id = 0;
> > > > > > + mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr].type = 0;
> > > > > > + mmio_dev->mmio_nr--;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + if (!found)
> > > > > > + r = -EINVAL;
> > > > >
> > > > > then get rid of found
> > > >
> > > > Sure.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > regards
> > > > Yang, Sheng
> > > >
> > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > > > > > + return r;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user *mmio_user)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio mmio;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mmio.dev_id = mmio_user->dev_id;
> > > > > > + mmio.type = mmio_user->type;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return kvm_free_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.h b/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.h
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 0000000..01b6587
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.h
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > > > > > +#ifndef __KVM_MSIX_MMIO_H__
> > > > > > +#define __KVM_MSIX_MMIO_H__
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * MSI-X MMIO emulation
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Intel Corporation
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version
> > > > > > 2. See + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Author:
> > > > > > + * Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int kvm_register_msix_mmio_dev(struct kvm *kvm);
> > > > > > +int kvm_unregister_msix_mmio_dev(struct kvm *kvm);
> > > > > > +int kvm_vm_ioctl_register_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user *mmio_user);
> > > > > > +int kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user *mmio_user);
> > > > > > +int kvm_free_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msix_mmio
> > > > > > *mmio_user); +
> > > > > > +#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
