Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Weight-balanced tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/23/2011 07:02 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_WEIGHT_BALANCED_TREE) += wbtree.o
>
>  then kvm can select it, and the impact on non-kvm kernels is removed.

Then we'd have issues trying to build an external kvm module for a
pre-existing non-kvm kernel.  Do we care?

Officially, no.

What we typically do in these cases is copy the code into the kvm-kmod compatibility layer and compile it if the kernel doesn't supply it (like all older kernels regardless of config).

If we were to take such a
path, I think the default should be on, kvm would depend on it, but we
could add an option to disable it for EMBEDDED/EXPERT.  Thanks,

That would work as well.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux