> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 02/23/2011 12:09:15 PM: Hi Michael, > > Yes. Michael Tsirkin had wanted to see how the MQ RX patch > > would look like, so I was in the process of getting the two > > working together. The patch is ready and is being tested. > > Should I send a RFC patch at this time? > > Yes, please do. Sure, will get a build/test on latest bits and send in 1-2 days. > > The TX-only patch helped the guest TX path but didn't help > > host->guest much (as tested using TCP_MAERTS from the guest). > > But with the TX+RX patch, both directions are getting > > improvements. > > Also, my hope is that with appropriate queue mapping, > we might be able to do away with heuristics to detect > single stream load that TX only code needs. Yes, that whole stuff is removed, and the TX/RX path is unchanged with this patch (thankfully :) > > Remote testing is still to be done. > > Others might be able to help here once you post the patch. That's great, will appreciate any help. Thanks, - KK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
