Re: [PATCH] kvm/svm: fix DR interception handling on upcoming AMD CPUs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/09/2011 02:56 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 05:43:28AM -0500, Andre Przywara wrote:
>  Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>  >  On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:22:29PM -0500, Andre Przywara wrote:
>  >>  Somehow the code line advancing the RIP and checking for exceptions
>  >>  got dropped between the post on the ML and the commit.
>  >>  Add it again to let guests boot on upcoming AMD CPUs again.
>  >>
>  >>  Reported-by: Joerg Roedel<joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
>  >>  Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara<andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
>  >>  ---
>  >>   arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |    1 +
>  >>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  >>
>  >>  diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>  >>  index 25bd1bc..be06e58 100644
>  >>  --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>  >>  +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>  >>  @@ -2776,6 +2776,7 @@ static int dr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  >>   		if (!err)
>  >>   			kvm_register_write(&svm->vcpu, reg, val);
>  >>   	}
>  >>  +	kvm_complete_insn_gp(&svm->vcpu, err);
>  >
>  >  Any exception check takes presedence over the intercept. So a call to
>  >  skip_emulated_instruction should be sufficient here.

>  You are right, but I think this way the implementation is cleaner and
>  more generic. If there is no exception condition detected (err==0), then
>  the call will just do skip_emulated_instruction anyway.
>  But as I write this, I see that err is not initialized, so I'd propose
>  this corrected version of the patch instead.

One function call is not less clean than another and this function call
has more overhead.
Beside that, looking at kvm_set_dr this function only returns 1 if one
tries to set dr4 or dr5 while CR4.DE is not set. In this case the
function you call here would inject a #GP but architecturally a #UD
is required.
This problem doesn't matter too much because the exceptions take
precedence over the intercept anyway so it is sufficient to call
skip_emulated_instruction here.

Given that the exception is incorrect I agree skip_emulated_instruction() is a better choice here.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux