Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert tsc_write_lock to raw_spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/07/2011 06:35 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-02-04 22:03, Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 02/04/2011 04:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Code under this lock requires non-preemptibility. Ensure this also over
-rt by converting it to raw spinlock.

Oh dear, I had forgotten about that.  I believe kvm_lock might have the
same assumption in a few places regarding clock.
I only found a problematic section in kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier. Didn't
see this during my tests as I have CPUFREQ disabled in my .config.

We may need something like this as converting kvm_lock would likely be
overkill:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 36f54fb..971ee0d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4530,7 +4530,7 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va
  	struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
  	struct kvm *kvm;
  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
-	int i, send_ipi = 0;
+	int i, me, send_ipi = 0;

  	/*
  	 * We allow guests to temporarily run on slowing clocks,
@@ -4583,9 +4583,11 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va
  		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
  			if (vcpu->cpu != freq->cpu)
  				continue;
+			me = get_cpu();
  			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
-			if (vcpu->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+			if (vcpu->cpu != me)
  				send_ipi = 1;
+			put_cpu();
  		}
  	}
  	spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);

Jan


That looks like a good solution, and I do believe that is the only place the lock is used in that fashion - please add a comment though in the giant comment block above that preemption protection is needed for RT. Also, gcc should catch this, but moving the me variable into the kvm_for_each_vcpu loop should allow for better register allocation.

The only other thing I can think of is that RT lock preemption may break some of the CPU initialization semantics enforced by kvm_lock if you happen to get a hotplug event just as the module is loading. That should be rare, but if it is indeed a bug, it would be nice to fix, it would be a panic for sure not to initialize VMX.

Cheers,

Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux