On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:51:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 02/07/2011 03:48 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > >> That's quite pointless, since those interrupts will be coalesced by > >> the guest. > >> > >Yes, of course, and this is what I remember happening. At this point > >interrupt de-coalescing kicks in. > > Maybe a more useful API would be to supply the callback with the > number of missed wakeups since the last callback. The callback > could then change the wakeup frequency to compensate, or do other > clever things. If it needs the old behaviour, it can just execute > its code in a loop. > Mat be. Or may be we can ask for new behaviour during timer creation. I was just surprised about the claim that we lost wakeups. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
