Hi Bernhard,
On 2010-09-14 15:51, Bernhard Kohl wrote:
> The setting of the irq0override flag must be also passed properly
> to the KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kohl <bernhard.kohl@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> qemu-kvm-x86.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-kvm-x86.c b/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> index fd974b3..e35c234 100644
> --- a/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> +++ b/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> @@ -1388,9 +1388,9 @@ int kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(void)
> }
> }
> for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) {
> - if (i == 0) {
> + if (i == 0 && irq0override) {
> r = kvm_add_irq_route(kvm_context, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2);
> - } else if (i != 2) {
> + } else if (i != 2 || !irq0override) {
> r = kvm_add_irq_route(kvm_context, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, i);
> }
> if (r < 0) {
While cleaning up the irq0override fragments, I stumbled over this
commit. It is a nop for qemu-kvm, today and also by the time it was applied:
irq0override = !kvm_irqchip || kvm_has_gsi_routing
But, for obvious reasons, the code above is only executed when gsi
routing is available.
Can you remember what motivated this patch?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
