Re: [PATCH 16/22] Introduce VCPU self-signaling service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-02-01 14:50, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:33:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> +++ b/cpus.c
>>>> @@ -531,6 +531,17 @@ void qemu_cpu_kick(void *env)
>>>>      return;
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +void qemu_cpu_kick_self(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +#ifndef _WIN32
>>>> +    assert(cpu_single_env);
>>>> +
>>>> +    raise(SIG_IPI);
>>>> +#else
>>>> +    abort();
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  void qemu_notify_event(void)
>>>>  {
>>>>      CPUState *env = cpu_single_env;
>>>> @@ -808,6 +819,16 @@ void qemu_cpu_kick(void *_env)
>>>>      }
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +void qemu_cpu_kick_self(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    assert(cpu_single_env);
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!cpu_single_env->thread_kicked) {
>>>> +        qemu_thread_signal(cpu_single_env->thread, SIG_IPI);
>>>> +        cpu_single_env->thread_kicked = true;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>
>>> There is no need to use cpu_single_env, can pass CPUState instead.
>>>
>>
>> It's done intentionally this way: function shall not be used for a
>> remote env.
>>
>> Jan
> 
> Can assert on qemu_cpu_self(env) for that.
> 

We already assert on cpu_single_env which is the right condition.
Removing env from the parameter list avoids that someone even thinks
about misusing it.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux