2011/1/29 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 01/29/2011 12:32 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >>> >>> > But a hypothetical -incoming unix.*,ft_mode would have to be >>> > implemented >>> > twice. >> >> You mean Kemari should be able to use with unix domain sockets, >> or other local communication patch? Since Kemari needs two >> remote hosts, I don't see why need to use unix domain sockets >> except for testing. Maybe I'm missing the point:) > > Well, I mentioned unix because it is basically the only other migration > protocol implemented in QEMU, but the file descriptor backend could also be > used. Kemari-over-SCTP could be an interesting application too for example. > > I'm not saying you should adjust the other patches for the implementation, > but the syntax to invoke Kemari should be future-proof. Yes, I understand. I'm not negative to your suggestion at all, but trying to figure out what would be the best :) Let me take your suggestion to use "-incoming kemari:tcp:<host>:<port>" in the next spin, and see what others think. Thanks, Yoshi > > Paolo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
