On Fri, Jan 28, 2011, Juerg Haefliger wrote about "Re: [PATCH 0/29] nVMX: Nested VMX, v8": > This branch doesn't even compile: >... > drivers/staging/smbfs/dir.c:286: error: static declaration of > ג??smbfs_dentry_operationsג?? follows non-static declaration >... Thanks, I'll look as soon as possible into why this has happened. Although this obviously has nothing to do with the nested patches themselves (which didn't touch anything outside KVM, and certainly nothing related to smbfs) so there must be something wrong with the base version I used - which I thought (but I'll recheck) was just the current kvm.git master head at the time I sent the patches. Needless to say, I did try compiling this version (and running it), but I used a very minimal .config, and didn't try to compile smbfs. > It's probably not related to your patch but doesn't make me very > comfortable about the stability of the resulting kernel. Can I safely > apply your patch to the latest -rc kernel? I have rebased the patches to the latest kvm.git head at the time I sent the patches - not to any official KVM or Linux version. If the "latest rc kernel" contains a recent enough version of KVM, the patches might work on it, but I simply don't know (and haven't tested it). Good luck, and I'll look into the non-compiling smbfs issue right after the weekend. Thanks, Nadav. -- Nadav Har'El | Friday, Jan 28 2011, 24 Shevat 5771 nyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |Amateurs built the ark - professionals http://nadav.harel.org.il |built the Titanic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
