Re: [PATCH 3/3] Provide control over unmapped pages (v4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> [2011-01-28 16:24:19]:

> >
> > But the assumption for LRU order to change happens only if the page
> > cannot be successfully freed, which means it is in some way active..
> > and needs to be moved no?
> 
> 1. holded page by someone
> 2. mapped pages
> 3. active pages
> 
> 1 is rare so it isn't the problem.
> Of course, in case of 3, we have to activate it so no problem.
> The problem is 2.
>

2 is a problem, but due to the size aspects not a big one. Like you
said even lumpy reclaim affects it. May be the reclaim code could
honour may_unmap much earlier. 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux