On 2011-01-25 15:53, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/25/2011 04:41 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > kvm: Allow memory slot array to grow on demand >> > > >> > > Remove fixed KVM_MEMORY_SLOTS limit, allowing the slot array >> > > to grow on demand. Private slots are now allocated at the >> > > front instead of the end. Only x86 seems to use private slots, >> > >> > Hmm, doesn't current user space expect slots 8..11 to be the private >> > ones and wouldn't it cause troubles if slots 0..3 are suddenly >> reserved? >> >> The private slots aren't currently visible to userspace, they're >> actually slots 32..35. The patch automatically increments user passed >> slot ids so userspace has it's own zero-based view of the array. >> Frankly, I don't understand why userspace reserves slots 8..11, is this >> compatibility with older kernel implementations? > > I think so. I believe these kernel versions are too old now to matter, > but of course I can't be sure. Will check and enable those 4 additional slots for user space if we no longer need to exclude them. Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature