Hi,
By the way, we don't have a QEMUState but instead use globals.
/me wants to underline this.
IMO it is absolutely pointless to worry about ways to pass around
kvm_state. There never ever will be a serious need for that.
We can stick with the current model of keeping global state in global
variables. And just do the same with kvm_state.
Or we can move to have all state in a QEMUState struct which we'll pass
around basically everywhere. Then we can simply embed or reference
kvm_state there.
I'd tend to stick with the global variables as I don't see the point in
having a QEMUstate. I doubt we'll ever see two virtual machines driven
by a single qemu process. YMMV.
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
