On 01/13/2011 10:23 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/13/2011 05:06 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
I think the first patch needs some reference counting... I'd move it to
the outermost KVM_RUN loop to reduce the performance impact.
I don't see how refcounting from that other thread could
possibly help, and I now see that the task_struct_cachep
does not have SLAB_DESTROY_BY_LRU, either :(
What do you have in mind here that would both work and
be acceptable to you as KVM maintainer?
I think a 'struct pid' fits the bill here.
Indeed it does. New patches on the way later, after I have
tested them some more.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
