Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/12/2011 10:26 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 22:02 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:

Cgroups only makes the matter worse - libvirt places
each KVM guest into its own cgroup, so a VCPU will
generally always be alone on its own per-cgroup, per-cpu
runqueue!  That can lead to pulling a VCPU onto our local
CPU because we think we are alone, when in reality we
share the CPU with others...

How can that happen?  If the task you're trying to accelerate isn't in
your task group, the whole attempt should be a noop.

Nono, all the VCPUs from the same guest are in the same
cgroup.  However, with 4 VCPUs and 4 physical CPUs,
chances are that they're all alone on their own per-cpu,
per-cgroup cfs_rq.

However, each CPU might have other runnable processes in
other cfs_rq sched entities.

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux