On 01/03/2011 12:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 03.01.2011 11:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 11:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> at least in kvm mode, the qemu_fair_mutex seems to have lost its
>> function of balancing qemu_global_mutex access between the io-thread and
>> vcpus. It's now only taken by the latter, isn't it?
>>
>> This and the fact that qemu-kvm does not use this kind of lock made me
>> wonder what its role is and if it is still relevant in practice. I'd
>> like to unify the execution models of qemu-kvm and qemu, and this lock
>> is the most obvious difference (there are surely more subtle ones as
>> well...).
>>
>
> IIRC it was used for tcg, which has a problem that kvm doesn't have: a
> tcg vcpu needs to hold qemu_mutex when it runs, which means there will
> always be contention on qemu_mutex. In the absence of fairness, the tcg
> thread could dominate qemu_mutex and starve the iothread.
>
> This doesn't happen with kvm since kvm vcpus drop qemu_mutex when running.
>
I see. Then I guess we should do this:
diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index 9bf5224..0de8552 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.c
@@ -734,9 +734,7 @@ static sigset_t block_io_signals(void)
void qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(void)
{
if (kvm_enabled()) {
- qemu_mutex_lock(&qemu_fair_mutex);
qemu_mutex_lock(&qemu_global_mutex);
- qemu_mutex_unlock(&qemu_fair_mutex);
} else {
qemu_mutex_lock(&qemu_fair_mutex);
if (qemu_mutex_trylock(&qemu_global_mutex)) {
I think so, though Anthony or Marcelo should confirm my interpretation
first.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
