On 12/30/2010 09:32 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > I don't think it's going to work: we are not > in the context of the right process. Further > I think we should keep the option of > reading the PBA status from the device or host kernel open. > And generally having an interface > for functionality we don't implement is not a good idea: > you don't know whether you really can support the interface you promised. Well, I don't know if we want to read PBA from device directly. To me it's not a good idea because the real device has nothing to do with the one we show to the guest.
Right. vPBA.bit = pPBA.bit | recorded_pending_bit_from_lazy_masked_interrupt.
At least direct accessing the mask bits of real device would be very dangerous. Avi?
Agree. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
