On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:15 +0800 Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/16/2010 09:17 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0200 > > Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Why have an argument at all? Always nmi to all cpus. > > > > I think Avi's suggest is better, and I will use > "inject-nmi" (without cpu-index argument) to send NMI to all cpus, > like physical GUI. If some one want to send NMI to a set of cpus, > he can use "inject-nmi" multiple times. His suggestion is to drop _all_ arguments, right Avi? This will simplify things, but you'll need a small refactoring to keep the human monitor behavior (which accepts a cpu index). > I also like "cpu-index", so I have to add another patch for > coverting current "cpu_index" to "cpu-index". > > Thanks, > Lai > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
