On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:36:07PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 03:03:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > No, because they do receive service (they spend some time spinning > > before being interrupted), so the respective vruntimes will increase, at > > some point they'll pass B0 and it'll get scheduled. > > Is that sufficient to ensure that B0 receives its fair share (1/3 cpu in this > case)? Hmm perhaps yes, althought at cost of tons of context switches, which would be nice to minimize on? - vatsa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
