Re: [PATCH] kvm-vmx: add module parameter to avoid trapping HLT instructions (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/02/2010 08:42 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
OK, let's say a single PCPU == 12 Compute Units.

If the guest is the first to migrate to a newly added unused host, and
we are using either non-trapping hlt or Marcelo's non-yielding trapping
hlt, then that guest is going to get more CPU than it expected unless
there is some throttling mechanism.  Specifically, it will get 12CU
instead of 1-3CU.

Do you agree with that?

Yes.

There's definitely a use-case to have a hard cap.

But I think another common use-case is really just performance isolation. If over the course of a day, you go from 12CU, to 6CU, to 4CU, that might not be that bad of a thing.

If the environment is designed correctly, of N nodes, N-1 will always be at capacity so it's really just a single node hat is under utilized.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

thanks,
-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux