Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: Use ioeventfd for virtqueue notify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/2010 01:44 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>>  And, what about efficiency?  As in bits/cycle?
>
>  We are running benchmarks with this latest patch and will report results.

Full results here (thanks to Khoa Huynh):

http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/VirtioIoeventfd

The host CPU utilization is scaled to 16 CPUs so a 2-3% reduction is
actually in the 32-48% range for a single CPU.

The guest CPU utilization numbers include an efficiency metric: %vcpu
per MB/sec.  Here we see significant improvements too.  Guests that
previously couldn't get more CPU work done now have regained some
breathing space.

Thanks for those numbers. The guest improvements were expected, but the host numbers surprised me. Do you have an explanation as to why total host load should decrease?

Seems to me the host is doing more work, and doing it less efficiently (by ping-ponging requests to another thread).

In any case, looks like good improvement with no downsides.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux