Re: [PATCH 2/3] Refactor zone_reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-01 10:16:34]:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-01 10:23:29]:
> 
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:45:55 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Refactor zone_reclaim, move reusable functionality outside
> > > of zone_reclaim. Make zone_reclaim_unmapped_pages modular
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Why is this min_mapped_pages based on zone (IOW, per-zone) ?
> >
> 
> Kamezawa-San, this has been the design before the refactoring (it is
> based on zone_reclaim_mode and reclaim based on top of that).  I am
> reusing bits of existing technology. The advantage of it being
> per-zone is that it integrates well with kswapd. 
>

My local MTA failed to deliver the message, trying again. 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux