On 12/01/2010 01:50 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:52:22AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> On 11/30/2010 09:29 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> >>>> + if (!shadow_accessed_mask) >>>> + return; >>>> + >>> I don't get this. As far as I can see VMX inits shadow_accessed_mask to >>> be zero if ept is enabled. This line here means that we never prefault with ept >>> enabled. It is opposite from what it should be. >>> >> >> Since it's no accessed bit on EPT, it's no way to distinguish between actually >> accessed translations and prefault. > Why is this a problem? We do what this page to not be evicted again > since we expect it to be accessed. > It can't avoid the page to be evicted again since the page is marked accessed only when spte is droped or updated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
