> On 11/29/2010 10:53 AM, Paul Brook wrote: > >>> Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw > >>> under Kemari? > >> > >> It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration > >> working w/o Kemari. In addition, last I checked Kemari needs additional > >> hooks and it will be too hard to keep that out of tree until all devices > >> get it. > > > > That's not what I've been hearing earlier in this thread. > > The responses from Yoshi indicate that Stefan's summary is correct. i.e. > > the current Kemari implementation may require per-device hooks, but > > that's a bug and should be fixed before merging. > > It's actually really important that Kemari make use of an intermediate > layer such that the hooks can distinguish between a device access and a > recursive access. I'm failing to understand how this is anything other than running sed over block/*.c (or hw/*.c, depending whether you choose to rename the internal or external API). Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
