On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:39:13PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> >On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> >>Anthony, Blue > >> >> > >> >>No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied? > >> > > >> >Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to > >> >review it? > >> > > >> >IOW, last call if you have objections :-) > >> > > >> > >> I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers to get > >> it right. > >> > >> But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is needed? > >> > > > > The patch creates Openfirmware device path from qdev > > hierarchy. Each element of a device path depends on type of a bus > > the device resides on. You can find various bus bindings here: > > http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/ and main spec is here > > http://forthworks.com/standards/of1275.pdf. Format in which list of > > device paths is passed to firmware is documented by comment (it is very > > simple). The only thing missing is command line option documentation. I > > will add it and resend if no more changes are needed for patch to be > > excepted. > > The patches don't apply anymore due to recent changes to pcnet.c. Will resend rebased with documentation fixes after concluding discussion with Kevin. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
