Re: [PATCH RFC] kvm: fast-path msi injection with irqfd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:05:22AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:12:54AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Store irq routing table pointer in the irqfd object,
> > and use that to inject MSI directly without bouncing out to
> > a kernel thread.
> > 
> > While we touch this structure, rearrange irqfd fields to make fastpath
> > better packed for better cache utilization.
> > 
> > Some notes on the design:
> > - Use pointer into the rt instead of copying an entry,
> >   to make it possible to use rcu, thus side-stepping
> >   locking complexities.  We also save some memory this way.
> What locking complexity is there with copying entry approach?
> 
> > - Old workqueue code is still used for level irqs.
> >   I don't think we DTRT with level anyway, however,
> >   it seems easier to keep the code around as
> >   it has been thought through and debugged, and fix level later than
> >   rip out and re-instate it later.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > The below is compile tested only.  Sending out for early
> > flames/feedback.  Please review!
> > 
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h |    4 ++
> >  virt/kvm/eventfd.c       |   81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  virt/kvm/irq_comm.c      |    6 ++-
> >  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index a055742..b6f7047 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,
> >  				   unsigned long *deliver_bitmask);
> >  #endif
> >  int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, u32 irq, int level);
> > +int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry, struct kvm *kvm,
> > +		int irq_source_id, int level);
> >  void kvm_notify_acked_irq(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin);
> >  void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  				   struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian);
> > @@ -603,6 +605,7 @@ static inline void kvm_free_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> >  void kvm_eventfd_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> >  int kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags);
> >  void kvm_irqfd_release(struct kvm *kvm);
> > +void kvm_irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_routing_table *irq_rt);
> >  int kvm_ioeventfd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_ioeventfd *args);
> >  
> >  #else
> > @@ -614,6 +617,7 @@ static inline int kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void kvm_irqfd_release(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> > +static inline void kvm_irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> >  static inline int kvm_ioeventfd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_ioeventfd *args)
> >  {
> >  	return -ENOSYS;
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> > index c1f1e3c..49c1864 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> > @@ -44,14 +44,18 @@
> >   */
> >  
> >  struct _irqfd {
> > -	struct kvm               *kvm;
> > -	struct eventfd_ctx       *eventfd;
> > -	int                       gsi;
> > -	struct list_head          list;
> > -	poll_table                pt;
> > -	wait_queue_t              wait;
> > -	struct work_struct        inject;
> > -	struct work_struct        shutdown;
> > +	/* Used for MSI fast-path */
> > +	struct kvm *kvm;
> > +	wait_queue_t wait;
> > +	struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry __rcu *irq_entry;
> > +	/* Used for level IRQ fast-path */
> > +	int gsi;
> > +	struct work_struct inject;
> > +	/* Used for setup/shutdown */
> > +	struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
> > +	struct list_head list;
> > +	poll_table pt;
> > +	struct work_struct shutdown;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct workqueue_struct *irqfd_cleanup_wq;
> > @@ -125,10 +129,18 @@ irqfd_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
> >  {
> >  	struct _irqfd *irqfd = container_of(wait, struct _irqfd, wait);
> >  	unsigned long flags = (unsigned long)key;
> > +	struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq;
> >  
> > -	if (flags & POLLIN)
> > +	if (flags & POLLIN) {
> > +		rcu_read_lock();
> > +		irq = irqfd->irq_entry;
> Why not rcu_dereference()?

Of course. Good catch, thanks.

> And why it can't be zero here?

It can, I check below.

> >  		/* An event has been signaled, inject an interrupt */
> > -		schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
> > +		if (irq)
> > +			kvm_set_msi(irq, irqfd->kvm, KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID, 1);
> > +		else
> > +			schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
> > +		rcu_read_unlock();
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (flags & POLLHUP) {
> >  		/* The eventfd is closing, detach from KVM */
> > @@ -166,6 +178,7 @@ irqfd_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *wqh,
> >  static int
> >  kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
> >  {
> > +	struct kvm_irq_routing_table *irq_rt;
> >  	struct _irqfd *irqfd, *tmp;
> >  	struct file *file = NULL;
> >  	struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd = NULL;
> > @@ -215,6 +228,10 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
> >  		goto fail;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	irqfd_update(kvm, irqfd, rcu_dereference(kvm->irq_routing));
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> >  	events = file->f_op->poll(file, &irqfd->pt);
> >  
> >  	list_add_tail(&irqfd->list, &kvm->irqfds.items);
> > @@ -271,8 +288,15 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
> >  	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
> >  
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(irqfd, tmp, &kvm->irqfds.items, list) {
> > -		if (irqfd->eventfd == eventfd && irqfd->gsi == gsi)
> > +		if (irqfd->eventfd == eventfd && irqfd->gsi == gsi) {
> > +			/* This rcu_assign_pointer is needed for when
> > +			 * another thread calls kvm_irqfd_update before
> > +			 * we flush workqueue below.
> > +			 * It is paired with synchronize_rcu done by caller
> > +			 * of that function. */
> > +			rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> >  			irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
> > @@ -321,6 +345,41 @@ kvm_irqfd_release(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* Must be called under irqfds.lock */
> > +static void irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct _irqfd *irqfd,
> > +			 struct kvm_irq_routing_table *irq_rt)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e;
> > +	struct hlist_node *n;
> > +
> > +	if (irqfd->gsi >= irq_rt->nr_rt_entries) {
> > +		rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	hlist_for_each_entry(e, n, &irq_rt->map[irqfd->gsi], link) {
> > +		/* Only fast-path MSI. */
> > +		if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
> > +			rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, e);
> > +		else
> > +			rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> > +	}
> Shouldn't we flush workqueue if routing entry is gone?

You mean synchronize_rcu I think: we don't use
the entry from the workqueue, always from RCU read side critical section
(that's why it's tagged __rcu).  Caller of kvm_irqfd_update must do
synchronize_rcu and the comment below notes this.

> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Update irqfd after a routing change.  Caller must invoke synchronize_rcu
> > + * afterwards. */
> > +void kvm_irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_routing_table *irq_rt)
> > +{
> > +	struct _irqfd *irqfd;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(irqfd, &kvm->irqfds.items, list)
> > +		irqfd_update(kvm, irqfd, irq_rt);
> > +
> > +	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * create a host-wide workqueue for issuing deferred shutdown requests
> >   * aggregated from all vm* instances. We need our own isolated single-thread
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> > index 8edca91..265ab72 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> > @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> >  	return r;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> > -		       struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int level)
> > +int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> > +		struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int level)
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm_lapic_irq irq;
> >  
> > @@ -410,7 +410,9 @@ int kvm_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  	mutex_lock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> >  	old = kvm->irq_routing;
> >  	rcu_assign_pointer(kvm->irq_routing, new);
> > +	kvm_irqfd_update(kvm, new);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
> > +
> >  	synchronize_rcu();
> >  
> >  	new = old;
> > -- 
> > 1.7.3.2.91.g446ac
> 
> --
> 			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux