On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:48:46PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Monday 15 November 2010 15:42:50 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:37:21PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote: > > > > > We can back to them if there is someone really did it in that way. > > > > > But for all hypervisors using QEmu, I think we haven't seen such > > > > > kind of behavior yet. > > > > > > > > I would rather stick to the spec than go figure out what do BSD/Sun/Mac > > > > do, or will do. > > > > > > Sure, but no hurry for that. It doesn't similar to the API case, so we > > > can achieve it incrementally. > > > > Isn't the proposed way to solve this to move vector address/data > > handling into kernel too? If yes it does affect the API. > > It didn't afffect the API used by this patch. So the code can still be modified > after later. Then won't we have to support two APIs, forever? > -- > regards > Yang, Sheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
