On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > +static char *pcibus_get_fw_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
> > +{
> > + PCIDevice *d = (PCIDevice *)dev;
> > + char path[50], name[33];
> > + int off;
> > +
> > + off = snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s@%x",
> > + pci_dev_fw_name(dev, name, sizeof name),
> > + PCI_SLOT(d->devfn));
> > + if (PCI_FUNC(d->devfn))
> > + snprintf(path + off, sizeof(path) + off, ",%x", PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
>
> Can we *always* specify a slot number in the name?
> If yes I think we should, because I think we saw that the short form is
> ambiguous: if there's a device at a slot != 0, openfirmware will
> to match that against the name.
You accidentally something here.
> Right?
>
I do not see what is ambiguous here. Can you explain?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
