Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Inform user about INTEL_TXT dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/14/2010 12:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 14.11.2010 11:30, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 11/14/2010 11:18 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>  From: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>  Without CONFIG_INTEL_TXT, the user must not enable this feature in the
>>  BIOS. Otherwise, KVM will not work. Explain this dependency via a kernel
>>  log message.
>>
>>  Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  ---
>>    arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |    7 ++++++-
>>    1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>>  diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>  index 9367abc..ebafd57 100644
>>  --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>  +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>  @@ -1306,8 +1306,13 @@ static __init int vmx_disabled_by_bios(void)
>>                &&   tboot_enabled())
>>                return 1;
>>            if (!(msr&   FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED_OUTSIDE_SMX)
>>  -&&   !tboot_enabled())
>>  +&&   !tboot_enabled()) {
>>  +#ifndef CONFIG_INTEL_TXT
>>  +            printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: if TXT is enabled in the bios, "
>>  +                     "kvm depends on CONFIG_INTEL_TXT\n");
>>  +#endif
>>                return 1;
>>  +        }
>>        }
>>
>
>  Maybe reword to an instruction?
>
>  Something like
>
>    kvm: TXT enabled in the bios.  Either disable TXT in the bios, or
>  enable CONFIG_INTEL_TXT in your kernel.
>

I always get an aching head when thinking about these dependency: Does
FEATURE_CONTROL_LOCKED&&  !FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED_OUTSIDE_SMX
imply that the BIOS uses TXT? Or could it also mean that it just
disabled VT-x explicitly?

Probably the latter, at least that's what we took it to mean before it was renamed to that long string.

As CONFIG_INTEL_TXT is off, we do not know if
tboot_enabled is off as well.

I guess, if FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED_INSIDER_SMX_YADA_YADA_YADA is set, then the bios wants us to enable TXT. But if both bits are clear, the bios really doesn't want us to play with vmx. But it would be good to get Intel guidance before we pass our confusion on to users.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux