On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:50:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/11/2010 04:46 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:15:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > - if (nr == BP_VECTOR&& !svm_has(SVM_FEATURE_NRIP)) {
>> > + if (nr == BP_VECTOR&& !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS)) {
>>
>> What is static_cpu_has
>
> It's like boot_cpu_has, only it works by patching instead of a dynamic test.
>
>> and why you use it only here and boot_cpu_has
>> in all other places?
>
> A nano optimization, this is a more commonly used path.
Ok, I was just curious because I couldn't find the static_cpu_has by a
quick grep. Thanks for the explanation.
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
